MODULE MOCKUP · TENDER · Tender package builder · Tenderer register · TQR inbox · Evaluation matrix · 10 templates
1 Package builder 2 Tenderer register 3 TQR inbox 4 Evaluation matrix Acceptance
Module Design Tender Construction ← Phases

Tender module

Build tender packages from your existing project data. Run the tender period with probity-firewalled TQRs. Score, recommend, award — all auditable. Most valuable single use case in the product.

5 new entities 10 templates ~4 weeks build
Scene 1 of 4
Tender package builder
Drag components from your project into a tender bundle. Drawing register, scope of works, BoQ template, special conditions. One-click "Send to market" once approved.
⌕
AL
Adina Lieblich
Tender pack · Construction (slabs + headwall)
Stage: drafting · 7 components · 142 pages · close 2 Oct 2026 · 4 tenderers invited
Drag → into bundle
📋
ITT (Invitation to Tender)
⚖
Conditions of Tendering
📜
Scope of Works (auto from Project Info)
📐
Drawing register (IFT 8 drawings)
📊
Bill of Quantities template
✏
Special Conditions (custom)
📝
Evaluation criteria (probity)
📌
Geotech report
🌊
Hydrology assessment
📷
Site photos appendix
⚠
Risk register snapshot
📋
Draft contract
📑
Past project Q&A FAQ

Bundle · FDU-S2-2026-TP01

142 pages · 38 MB
📋
ITT (Invitation to Tender)
4 pp
×
⚖
Conditions of Tendering
12 pp
×
📜
Scope of Works auto from Project Info
18 pp
×
📐
Drawings (IFT) 8 drawings
36 pp
×
📊
Bill of Quantities template
8 pp
×
✏
Special Conditions custom · 4 edits
6 pp
×
📝
Evaluation criteria probity-friendly format
3 pp
×
Cover sheet adds: close date · contact officer · prequalification refs · ABN · GST treatment · all auto-filled from Project Info.
PROBITY READY All 7 invited tenderers receive identical pack. Any later TQR response must go to ALL 7 (or be marked probity-sensitive).
Scene 2 of 4
Tenderer register
Who's invited, who's accepted, who's bidding. Tracks the tender period at a glance. Bid prices populate from received forms.
Tenderers · 7 invited
5 accepted · 3 bids received · close in 4 days · estimate received: $1.68M – $2.15M range
Tenderer
ABN / cert
Invited
Status
Bid
Programme
Actions
Bayswater Civil Pty Ltdincumbent · pre-qualified
91 234 567 890
10 Sep
received
$1.82M
28 wks
Coastal Plant + Civilresponded to NOITT
76 543 210 987
10 Sep
received
$1.68M
26 wks
Northwood Construction Grouplarge-scale civil
12 345 678 901
10 Sep
received
$2.15M
22 wks
Tetra Plant Hire + Civillocally-based
34 567 890 123
10 Sep
accepted
awaiting
—
Granger Civil Pty Ltdtier-2 specialist
56 789 012 345
10 Sep
accepted
awaiting
—
Beachgrass Earthworkssmall + local
78 901 234 567
10 Sep
declined
declined invite
—
—
Bayside Hydraulicsspecialist (drainage)
90 123 456 789
10 Sep
invited
no response
—
Bid range
$1.68M – $2.15M
Median
$1.82M
vs Approved
−$40k median
Close in
4 days
Scene 3 of 4
TQR inbox · probity firewall
Tenderer questions during the tender period. Every response is logged. "Send to all" is the default — overriding it requires probity-sensitive justification.
TQR inbox · FDU-S2-2026-TP01
7 questions raised · 4 responded · 2 drafted · 1 unanswered · TQR cycle every Friday
Probity firewall Every response goes to ALL tenderers by default. To respond to one only, the response is marked "probity-sensitive" and an audit reason is required.
TQR-0114 Sep
Is the slab thickness 200mm or 250mm in drawing C-101? Raised by Bayswater Civil · response sent to all 7 tenderers · Addendum #1 issued
sent to all resp: 16 Sep
TQR-0216 Sep
Will the existing utilities survey be available? Raised by Northwood · attached survey to response · Addendum #1
sent to all resp: 17 Sep
TQR-0317 Sep
Can locally-won sand be used for backfill (PSD compliant)? Raised by Coastal · response: yes, subject to test results · Addendum #2
sent to all resp: 18 Sep
TQR-0419 Sep
Will site access be guaranteed during tide windows? Raised by Granger · draft response in progress · waiting on tidal data
DRAFT since 19 Sep
TQR-0520 Sep
Can we propose an alternative pipe material (HDPE vs concrete)? Raised by Tetra · needs designer input + sponsor approval · 4 days to respond
UNANSWERED due 22 Sep
TQR-0620 Sep
Is the 90 kg precast headwall option acceptable in lieu of 110 kg? Raised by Coastal · response: yes, subject to load check · Addendum #3
sent to all resp: 21 Sep
TQR-0721 Sep
Is the contract payment cycle 30 days from invoice date? Raised by Northwood · response: yes per standard council T&Cs · no addendum
sent to all resp: 22 Sep
Scene 4 of 4
Evaluation matrix
Score each tenderer against weighted criteria. Total score determines ranking. Award recommendation auto-drafts.
Evaluation matrix · FDU-S2-2026-TP01
3 bids received · 4 weighted criteria · 100% allocated · Coastal leading by 6.4 pts
Criterion
Weight
Bayswater Civil
Coastal Plant + Civil
Northwood
Price incl. risk allowance
40%
7.2
$1.82M
8.4
$1.68M
5.6
$2.15M
Programme realistic + risk-managed
20%
7.8
28 wks
8.2
26 wks
7.5
22 wks · tight
Experience similar past projects
20%
9.2
5 ref
7.4
3 ref
8.0
4 ref
Method statement technical approach
20%
7.5
8.6
7.0
Weighted total out of 100
100%
77.5
83.9
67.4
Ranking
2nd
★ RECOMMENDED
3rd
Award Recommendation auto-drafts

Click Generate Award Recommendation → and Lilach drafts the formal recommendation letter for Sponsor approval. Pulls: this matrix, all TQR history, panel notes, $ savings vs approved budget. One PDF to take to the next council meeting.

Acceptance
Tender module · shippable when
Tender is the highest-value single use case in the product. This list locks down what V1.0 of the module must deliver.
Tender module acceptance · 0 of 22